Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law at work

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:53, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

Law at work
Blatent advertising. Not notable. DJ Clayworth 13:55, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete not notable. - DS1953 14:38, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Adverts go to Wiki-Hell! -- BD2412 talk 15:25, 2005 Jun 8 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete: "Law at Work is a forward thinking organisation delivering employment-related legal services in a way that combines the strengths of a traditional legal practice with the flexibility of a consultancy model of delivery." I submit this sentence meets the criteria for patent nonsense. Would you want your lawyer to write like that? Smerdis of Tlön 18:43, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as patent nonsense. A surprising amount of marketing-speak meets that criteria. --Carnildo 23:58, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. It isn't Patent nonsense, but it is blatant advertising.  Too bad the CSD criteria doesn't list spam as a CSD.  SWAdair | Talk  05:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete advertising. JamesBurns 07:28, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .