Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of Importance


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:29, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Law of Importance

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Part of a four article walled-garden. This was prodded as being promotional over a month ago but the prod was recently disputed. The subject fails our general notability guideline because it has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Note that the related articles Woody Woodward, Emotional fingerprint and I-ology are also at AfD.  Them From  Space  10:52, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The four Notes items are two books by Woody Woodward, creator of the "law" (not sure why the second one lists a different author?), Woodward's own web site, and a blog by another self-help author. The references are all books by Woodward. None qualify as reliable third-party sources. Cnilep (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. No such "law" exists, it can not be verified by any identifiably reliable sources, and it smacks of soapboxing and original research. Bearian (talk) 00:18, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.