Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of One


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:07, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

Law of One
1) The page seems to be a a thinly veiled promotion for a psychic named David Wilcox. 2) The article adds nothing of interest to Edgar Cayce article it is linked from. 3) The article is so poorly written and thinly sketched out that it fails to illuminate the topic or even make the case that "Law of One" even is a topic worthy of a separate entry.

At best, the opening of the article might be included as a subtopic in the Edgar Cayce article. The rest of the article seems worthless to this reader, and quite possibly nothing more than a poor attempt at self-promotion. StrangeAttractor 06:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, I see no rhyme nor reason in the text. --Agamemnon2 07:26, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. The salvageable concepts are already elsewhere, and the rest doesn't make sense in its own terms. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 10:18, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Cayce already has an article - I don't see that his putative reincarnation needs one also.   Dl yo ns 493   Ta lk  13:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Quarl 22:07, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 02:44, 30 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.