Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of Tanglo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. decision is unmistakable-- SNOW delete  DGG ( talk ) 06:41, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Law of Tanglo

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

non notable "law", being promoted by its creator Wuh  Wuz  Dat  14:18, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unreferenced neologism. WWGB (talk) 14:19, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not only does the article give no sources, but Google gives no hits outside Wikipedia for either "Tanglo's Law" or "Law of Tanglo". JamesBWatson (talk) 14:34, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. No assertion that this law is known on a significant level under this name. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 16:22, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 16:44, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete: Sweet Jesus, what baloney.  If I knew any Norwegian racial epithets, I would use them here, but then I would violate Tanglo's Law, so I guess its for the best that I don't.  I did look for sources and found none.--Milowent (talk) 18:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Snow delete as WP:MADEUP. Cnilep (talk) 19:05, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per everybody above. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 03:46, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.