Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of accumulation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Capital accumulation. And merge content from history as may be appropriate.  Sandstein  07:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)

Law of accumulation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Duplicates information presented in Capital accumulation. – S. Rich (talk) 03:16, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:03, 30 March 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge as appropriate (if at all) and Redirect to Capital accumulation. It seems like the major point of difference is that this article brings up Smith. Do you think it would be appropriate to mention Smith in the other article? &mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 15:00, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Yes. Mention of Smith is appropriate per his writing on the topic. – S. Rich (talk) 18:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:40, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Redirect as mentioned since this may be best connected to him and there's nothing yet suggesting noticeable independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment. This seems to be a case of concepts in two areas having the same name. In this case Capitalism as part of Economics and Business as shown in Template:Capitalism of which Capital accumulation is a part and Capitalism as seen in Marxism as shown in Template:Marxian economics of which Law of accumulation is a part. The Marxist part could be a subpage of Capital accumulation, maybe under a more complete name such as Law of capital accumulation or General law of capital accumulation (a chapter title in Marx). That way it wouldn't dominate the parent article. StarryGrandma (talk) 06:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.