Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of behavior


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 23:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Law of behavior

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Prod removed after an attempt at improvement that doesn't seem to address the core problems. The only reference is a link to Wikiveristy in which it is clear that it is the user's own Original Research as an undergraduate. It seems not to make any sense anyway. At best it is very unclear. So, in summary, we have no notability, no verifiability, original research, self-promotion and possibly nonsense. DanielRigal (talk) 22:26, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * It uses Euclidean geometry and if you need a concrete example, plot time on the y-axis and commodities on the x-axis. I don't believe that I had a chance to explain myself fully on the page, but that was because I was also hoping that people would take notice and build on the article before scheduling it for deletion. It's a gem and I hope you will reconsider. Stimulieconomy (talk) 22:53, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Please read the policy on Original Research. Whether it is meaningful or not is not the main issue here. The main issue is whether this is notable and verifiable. As it is unpublished it can't be either. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 22:58, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. DanielRigal (talk) 23:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * Okay, I have slated the page and requested deletion in the future I will try not to make the same mistake. I would like to edit Wikipedia pages but perhaps I should start small. Thank you, and I'm sorry if I came across as mean. Stimulieconomy (talk) 23:06, 7 March 2012 (UTC)


 * OK. Thanks for that.
 * It is still on Wikiversity. I am not sure what the rules are over there. It might be OK. If not, I am sure there are plenty of other places you can self-publish it.
 * This AfD is now moot. I am not sure if I am allowed to close it myself so I will leave it for now. I am sure somebody will be along shortly to sort it out. --DanielRigal (talk) 23:14, 7 March 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.