Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of commodity value


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy delete. per WP:SNOW v/r - TP 12:28, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Law of commodity value

 * – ( View AfD View log )

PROD (and other tags) removed by author. Looks like a vanity article promoting a non-notable neologism. None of the references look relevant to demonstrating the notability of the concept/neologism in this context. The alleged economist behind this doesn't even have an article or get any hits in Google Scholar (assuming the person of the same name with a patent on purifying waste gasses is not the same person). Almost all of the Google Books/Scholar hits for "Law of commodity value" refer to Karl Marx and none that I have found so far refer to this guy. DanielRigal (talk) 21:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Apparent neologism, already deleted, giving the appearance that author is shopping this under different titles. 99.137.209.90 (talk) 22:07, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Comment Author blanked the page, but only after attempting to insert his research elsewhere . 99.137.209.90 (talk) 23:18, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Please add Commodity valuation, under the above deletion umbrella. 99.137.209.90 (talk) 23:38, 15 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Strong delete of this, under either name. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  23:56, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Snow delete. This is a student trying to promote himself and his theories.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:59, 15 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as utter bollocks. AndyTheGrump (talk) 01:08, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Redirect - to Law of value or Commodity value as a plausible search term → Σ  τ  c . 02:01, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete No known secondary source discusses topic—the references given are for peripheral concepts mentioned in the article. Johnuniq (talk) 08:48, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.