Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of conservation of information

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE as a duplicate of Law of conservation of information: First law of information Theory (see Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Law of conservation of information: First law of information Theory). jni 13:25, 6 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Law of conservation of information
Delete: Information is negative entropy; Entropy is not a conserved quantity. Ancheta Wis 13:10, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete - non-sensical mess -Vsmith 16:59, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Delete - doesn't even make enough sense to figure out what it is about. Starfoxy 20:51, 30 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I raised the VFD request - but I think it's clear that this is either: Delete in any case, I think... Nick 13:02, 1 Feb 2005 (UTC)
 * a misunderstanding of the 2nd Law,
 * something specific to medicine (see citation), or
 * a very specific example from a textbook out of context.

I'm pretty sure this is really badly translated from Chinese rather than completely made up, though the persistance of the author in adding this to EvoWiki articles makes me suspicious. Expect to see this page repeatedly recreated after it gets deleted. Joe D (t) 21:34, 3 Feb 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * A copy of this page has popped up as Law_of_Conservation_of_Information (capital C). Rl 14:51, 5 Mar 2005 (UTC)