Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Law of identity and Torah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 16:47, 1 December 2010 (UTC)

Law of identity and Torah

 * – ( View AfD View log ) •

This is an essay on religion, intended to promote the author's own views (the creation summary states:"This world-view is based on the ideas of Hofman Stern..."). Violates WP:OR, WP:SOAP, WP:COI, WP:RS. andy (talk) 11:14, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * DO NOT DELETE. The article has been edited, and is still being edited, and the author is no longer using himself as a reference. The author's name is no longer mentioned.  Simply because you and your friends are unfamiliar with the subject in this article does not mean that it is non-existent or worthless of study.  Many who oppose this article do so because of their own religious views and biases and are showing great bias on a subject simply because they know nothing about it. And where is it in the policies that by simply mentioning the Torah an article automatically becomes "religious?" Where is it written that the Bible cannot be mentioned or linked together with scientific articles?    —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.180.19 (talk) 10:59, 27 November 2010 (UTC) — 70.115.180.19 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.


 * There has been a long struggle throughout history between the principles of science and those of religion. This article is intended to show how some people can consolidate both.  This essay is not on religion but on the law of identity as it is mentioned in biblical texts.   This article is still being worked on. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hofman stern (talk • contribs) 2010-11-24T12:13:13
 * Delete. This is an essay, not an article.  There are lots of blogs that will host ideas.  Wikipedia is not for original research, spam, or free webspace.  If you want to advertise your ideas for free, there are many social networking websites for that purpose, including MySpace, LinkedIn, FaceBook, etc.  Wikipedia is not a webhost; it is a IRC 501 (c) (3) corporation, and you must abide by its tax-exempt, charitable status. Bearian (talk) 18:18, 24 November 2010 (UTC)


 * This is not orginal research, and it's not based on religion but on biblical text that imply logical axioms. There has been an attempt since ancient times to merge religion and science.  This article addresses these efforts. It is being edited and is still under construction.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.115.180.19 (talk) 18:58, 24 November 2010 (UTC) — 70.115.180.19 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions.  —andy (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions.  —andy (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions.  —andy (talk) 19:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - personal essays ipso facto violate WP:NOR Avi (talk) 19:13, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Snowball Delete per nom. Clear-cut, beyond obvious personal essay, exactly the sort of thing the personal essay policy was meant to prevent. --Steven J. Anderson (talk) 20:09, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Clear violation of WP:OR Nwlaw63 (talk) 20:27, 24 November 2010 (UTC)
 * 'WTF is this article trying to say? Joe407 (talk) 08:32, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
 * "A=A", I think. Clever, huh? (I take it that WTF = Delete) andy (talk) 09:56, 25 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Snow delete wikipedia is not the place for theological essays. Nergaal (talk) 07:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as per above - Wikipedia is not a free web host and is not the place for essays in general. julianmh (talk) 20:29, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete wikipedia is not the place for theological essays agreedTucsonDavid (talk) 11:11, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOR and WP:NOTMYSPACE, and please also read: An article about yourself is nothing to be proud of. IZAK (talk) 08:19, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.