Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawerance Newell,C.B.E


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 07:35, 13 January 2006 (UTC)

Lawerance_Newell%2CC.B.E
Delete. I haven't been able to verify the information, and it appears that even if it were verified, the subject wouldn't warrant an entire article, Brendanfox 09:00, 7 January 2006 (UTC) Keep and move, as per explanation below. --Brendanfox 11:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * weak keep. I've given the article a thorough overhaul, but there's very little info about him online. He does seem to be moderately notable, and articles on countries like PNG do help counter systemic bias. But, as I said, borderline... if kept it'll need moving to Lawrence Newell, too. Grutness...wha?  09:30, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Grutness. -- JJay 09:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've just found a few more mentions of Lawrence Newell here and here, combined with Grutness' point about systemic bias, I've changed my vote, to keep and move to Lawrence Newell. --Brendanfox 11:07, 7 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.