Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawns


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Keep, based on addditions made by Boleyn. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 17:36, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Lawns

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This is a WP:TWODABS page with a WP:PLURALPT kicker. I would propose that the clear primary topic in terms of long-term historical importance is the ancient and worldwide presence of maintained areas of grass and other plants in front of residences and other buildings. The city is comparatively obscure, so no disambiguation page is needed. Delete this page, redirect the title, "Lawns" to "Lawn", and add the city to the hatnote. bd2412 T 16:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 22:39, 28 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep - makes a good point about the lawns -- makes sense to keep with more than just the two. Delete and Redirect to Lawns, West Yorkshire, with a distinguish hatnote there per nom. --&mdash;  Rhododendrites  talk  \\ 00:07, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete and Redirect to lawn, with a hatnote, per nom. Lawn is viewed about 100 times as often as Lawns, West Yorkshire. The redirect should go there. --Sammy1339 (talk) 02:34, 29 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep I looked for other entries, and added The Lawns and {intitle|Lawns} to the see also - there are other pages that a reader could be looking for by typing in 'Lawns', and it's less confusing for readers to arrive at a disambiguation page, than at the wrong page. If an entry is judged to be the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, then a move discussion should be started, not an AfD. Boleyn (talk) 14:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep: the dab page serves a useful purpose, the more so with Boleyn's additions. The fact that Lawn is viewed much more often than Lawns, West Yorkshire is irrelevant to the consideration of what people searching on "lawns" expect to find. Pam  D  15:43, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.