Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Frankopan


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Soft delete - undeletion can be requested at WP:REFUND. — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 11:08, 27 January 2013 (UTC)

Lawrence Frankopan

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I can't work out what the notability of this person is, as most of this article and references are about his family not him. NtheP (talk) 12:34, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete. Only the first paragraph is about him, and only one claim is sourced, and neither of the claims is of a particular notability.  216.93.234.239 (talk) 23:26, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:25, 3 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:23, 7 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Comment. While some of his relations do seem notable, he certainly does not inherit notability from them - even if most of the current article gives undue attention to these relationships. However, his work as a sports agent (especially tennis) just might do so - while most of the GNews hits are just him acting as spokesperson for one of his clients, some such as this, even if they are not specifically about him, do seem to be treating him as an industry expert in his own right rather than on behalf of his clients or employers. While I am not seeing enough for a keep vote, there may be sources I am missing. PWilkinson (talk) 10:22, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 23:05, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:18, 21 January 2013 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.