Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Stepelevich


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Geschichte (talk) 07:38, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Lawrence Stepelevich

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Old Unreferenced BLP tagged in October 2017. The only external link appears to be an audio recording of a lecture by the subject. G-searches returned plenty of books *by* this person but none *about* this person. G-news and G-newspaper searches fetched up nothing from an RS that would confirm notability. Cheers, Baffle☿gab  02:37, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2021 June 1.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 03:02, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Philosophy-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:26, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. North America1000 03:27, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * weak keep with a decent number of citations for a low citation field he seems to be close to WP:PROF#1 and possible WP:NPROF#8 due to his long-term editorship of The Owl of Minerva (journal) which seems to be a respected journal in the field. --hroest 15:17, 1 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per WP:PROF for his long-term journal editorship and per WP:AUTHOR for the multiple reviews of multiple (but edited not authored) books. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  06:53, 8 June 2021 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Less Unless (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep As per WP:PROF & WP:AUTHOR1друг (talk) 21:28, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
 * Weak keep via WP:NPROF C8; the many reviewed volumes edited by the subject help support notability. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 12:25, 18 June 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.