Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Stowe


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:41, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Lawrence Stowe

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

It's been a mess for 10 years. Time to put it out of its misery. Fuddle (talk) 17:16, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 17:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 17:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Texas-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (talk page) (Contribs) Remember to notify me after replying off my talk page. 17:38, 22 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete some coverage as a ’21st Century Snake Oil’ Salesman but there's only a few such articles -> he is only really anywhere near notable for one event, an appearance on 60 minutes (that is not even mentioned in the article). The article is further a complete puff peace, nothing to establish any sort of basic notability. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:19, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete a non-notable individual.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:43, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep -- for a short while. Give the matter probation. Those who contributed should be summoned to fix it. The lack of proper documentation is indeed problematic. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dogru144 (talk • contribs)


 * Delete Would require huge amount of work to bring it up to standards; not sure if the subject is notable enough to warrant that. In any case, as a BLP with no references, should be just deleted. Or if someone volunteers to rewrite this properly, then draftify for now. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:52, 23 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Even with the sources introduced by Eddie891 the subject still falls short of WP:GNG. Best, GPL93 (talk) 21:05, 28 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.