Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lawrence Washington (1565-1616)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Randykitty (talk) 16:38, 13 July 2018 (UTC)

Lawrence Washington (1565-1616)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not a genealogy site. See other AfDs for this user's articles. Etzedek24 (Would it kill ya to leave an edit summary?) 20:48, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete - being the great great great grandfather of George Washington is not in itself notable. There are no other assertions of notability in the article and I can find no other myself.  Search results appear to be just a long list of genealogy or similar sites. -- Whpq (talk) 21:08, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  22:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Redirect/merge to List_of_United_States_political_families_(W)Thanks,L3X1 ◊distænt write◊  22:44, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTINHERITED. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete being the grandfather of George Washington is not enough to make him notable per WP:NOTINHERITED and there is absolutely no other information in the article to make a case for notability. Tillerh11 (talk) 00:56, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete per Whpq. Also, the article has no sources. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:12, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - WP:NOTGENEALOGY Agricolae (talk) 02:41, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is not properly written, sourced, and formatted.TH1980 (talk) 04:27, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete article with no substnace, no sources and no actual claim to notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 20:08, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note - wrong birthrate - 1568 - I think. An article probably could be developed on this Washington - scholar hits - if someone is inclined to do the rescue work. At current form TNT is begging. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Icewhiz (talk • contribs) 12:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete MensanDeltiologist (talk) 19:19, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - he's one of many remote ancestors of a famous descendant. An argument could be made he could pass if somebody wanted to do the work. Bearian (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.