Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lay It on Me (Ina Wroldsen and Broiler song)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. TonyBallioni (talk) 02:52, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Lay It on Me (Ina Wroldsen and Broiler song)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ranking on music charts in only one country does not establish notability per WP:NSONGS. Hayman30 (talk) 08:13, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Norway-related deletion discussions. Happy New Year!!! Baby miss  fortune 08:18, 30 December 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. I think this article could be expanded with a bit more information in its current state but am aware that it's a bit bare at the moment. If not, however, it should probably be redirected.  Ss  112   08:53, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Unless I've misread it, WP:NSONGS does not mention having to chart in multiple countries. As above though is does need some more info. Usually getting certified Platinum means a song has entered into popular culture enough to make it notable, at least in Norway anyway. Mattg82 (talk) 23:40, 30 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Quote "Has been ranked on national or significant music or sales charts." I might be overly fussy here but the song has only charted on 1 music chart and 1 sales chart, both of which are Norway charts. Besides, "this indicates only that a song may be notable, not that it is notable." Can't really see how going platinum in one country would make it notable. Hayman30 (talk) 13:05, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * It might be best to redirect then if no other claims to notability are forth coming. Mattg82 (talk) 13:48, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   09:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:NSONG criteria. Nothing indicates the song has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial published works whose sources are independent of the artist and label. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rpclod (talk • contribs) 12:55, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Redirect per WP:NSONG there needs to be enough content for a standalone article SeraphWiki (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   18:47, 13 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.