Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Laysha Ostrow


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. North America1000 01:33, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Laysha Ostrow

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Contested PROD. Biography of an academic who does not meet WP:PROF and I do not believe she meets WP:GNG either. bonadea contributions talk 05:55, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk &bull;&#32;mail) 11:54, 23 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Per request Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious lack of notability - David Gerard (talk) 00:31, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Article provides no evidence of notability through WP:GNG or otherwise. —David Eppstein (talk) 21:01, 24 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:53, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as nothing at all here for actual substance and independent notability. SwisterTwister   talk  06:01, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Comment Did anyone check Google Scholar? She's written a number of articles in health journals that you can look at if you search there. She also pops up in a Google Book search. I can't chase these down at the moment, but I think it's worth looking at. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 00:46, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Writing articles isn't usually held to pass the notability bar. I looked and don't see anything jump out at me. Do you have particular convincing examples you're thinking of? - David Gerard (talk) 10:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Due to the above comment, We may relist this debate.  NasssaNser 03:35, 31 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:47, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. GS citations indicate WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:36, 2 September 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete: WP:PROMO and WP:TOOSOON at this time. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. No real claim to notability and low single-digit GS. Agricola44 (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.