Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lazer Team 2


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The options boil down to "redirect, not yet notable" and "keep already notable" or "keep soon notable", but the argument for keeping is perhaps slightly more convincing as gongshow's sources have not been contested. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC)

Lazer Team 2

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of any notability. All the refs are social media or trivial. Was a redirect and probably should still be a redirect. Fails WP:GNG  Velella  Velella Talk 08:58, 13 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep It is in desperate need of expanding once the film has come out especially with references, but I fail to agree that the film is not notable. With Thanks - Lee Vilenski(talk) 15:45, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The teaser for the sequel is out and its a good time to have it up. Crazybob2014 (talk) 16:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep There will be a LOT more to add once it comes out, which is only a month away. The article should stay up. &mdash;Jman98 20:56, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect for now to Lazer Team until at least its release date. Not notable at the moment, but restoring the redirect to the subsection of its prequel until it gains notability post-release (which'll be in a month anyways) seems like a better idea than just deleting it. Booyahhayoob (talk) 04:41, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep The problem is that much of the detail due to Rooster Teeth being an internet production company will come through nothing, but social media, which means this round o0f social media is still very relevant. In the coming weeks, more "legitimate" sources will cover the movie.  At that point, I and no doubt several others will personally add details and sources.Daneonwayne (talk) 03:46, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Lazer Team. While the movie may very well be notable once it comes out, right now it is not notable. Per WP:TOOSOON, the supposition that a topic will be notable in the future is not sufficient to warrant an article existing now. - Iago Qnsi (talk) 00:33, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  J 947 ( c ) (m)   04:52, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:44, 21 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep - there appears to have been a fairly steady stream of coverage since this film was announced.  gongshow   talk  17:47, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Merge/Redirect per above. Artw (talk) 01:47, 26 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect For now. In a month when we have more info we can revert and expand. L3X1 (distænt write)  01:39, 28 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.