Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LeShaun


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Black Kite 19:01, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

LeShaun

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Notability other than relationships is not shown. Completely without references and full of dubious statements and rumors: "Leshaun and Ludacris are brothers and sisters", "She might get a part in Why Did I Get Married Too. It's been a rumor." BLP issue. Reywas92 Talk 20:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete clearly non notable,I think it should be deleted as soon as possible the authour is edit warring (removing afd) instead of discussing it here-- NotedGrant  Talk  20:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - but please finish the AfD listing. Bearian (talk) 20:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Despite the impression that all the industriously wacky editing gives, there actually is a recording artist using this name, and some of the article content is apparently accurate  and there's a decent version of the article kicking around somewhere in the history.  The current nonsense might have something to do with a lawsuit she filed, although it is a bit old (but don't music industry lawsuits just go on forever?)  Deletion decision should be based on the best possible text, not the vandalized rubbish. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep as per Hullaballoo. That the article is not currently of high quality does not mean that it should be deleted.  Xihr  07:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Has in entry in a print encyclopedia, so the outside world considers this to be an encyclopedic subject. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:33, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions.  — J04n(talk page) 00:04, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets criterion 1.  Multiple RS news articles.--Epeefleche (talk) 09:03, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.