Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Centre Sheraton Hotel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Let's see if we can expand the article. If all else fails, feel free to AfD again. Thanks everyone. Missvain (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

Le Centre Sheraton Hotel

 * – ( View AfD View log )

A perfectly normal nice hotel; the article contains no claim of notability. Four sources in the article are a blog, a database listing, and two articles about events that occurred at the hotel. WP:BEFORE revealed advertising, WP:ROUTINE, WP:MILL coverage, and directory style listings. The article does not meet WP:GNG or WP:NBUILD: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Does not have coverage that meets significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability WP:RS, WP:SIGCOV. The article makes no claim that there is historic, social, economic, or architectural importance.  // Timothy ::  talk  06:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy ::  talk  06:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: to discuss sources presented in the last !vote
 * Delete: It is a fairly tall building but architectural importance is probably not present, as it is only the 37th tallest in Montreal and the fourth tallest hotel there. I also did not manage to find significant coverage. - Tristan Surtel (talk) 10:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete. Hotels are pretty WP:MILL, and exist in every city on earth. (Some small towns might not have any hotels, but any city of moderate size will.) And furthermore, the vast majority of hotels are part of international hotel chains rather than being standalone independent entities. Accordingly, there's no point in indiscriminately maintaining an unsourced article about every hotel that exists — the bar for making a hotel notable enough for a Wikipedia article requires reliably sourced evidence of its significance, such as a noteworthy historical or cultural impact. Bearcat (talk) 14:29, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Weak delete - it has a couple of claims to fame but not enough to be notable. I'm on the edge with this one. Bearian (talk) 22:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep easily passes WP:GNG, just needs improvement. The English-language Gazette gave it a three-page spread when it opened, not including a full-page ad, which ran with a number of advertisements wishing the hotel good luck, which was common for large projects around those times:  and some coverage from far away here: . That's just English-language coverage. Not all hotels are notable, but I'm disappointed that this is being dismissed as a "routine hotel", especially since hotels are one area of the encyclopaedia where I've been editing recently. SportingFlyer  T · C  18:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 Talk Work 14:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep The sources provided by SportingFlyer plus the sources in the article are more than adequate to pass WP:GNG. Oakshade (talk) 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.