Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Crocodile (cancelled film project)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is to keep per the discovered trans-wiki references. (non-admin closure) Winged Blades Godric 08:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)

Le Crocodile (cancelled film project)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The film was never made. Fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 02:23, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:16, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:26, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. The detail and sources on the French Wikipedia page suggest this is notable, so that the page could be improved. Mortee (talk) 16:25, 11 February 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 04:52, 18 February 2017 (UTC)   References 
 * Comment. Its claim to fame in the English-speaking world (and the reason I had heard of it) was as an unfinished project involving Peter Sellers. Considering it isn't even mentioned in the Peter Sellers article, that is a slim claim. Jack N. Stock (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. We have, as Mortee correctly points out, a well developed and sourced article at fr:Le Crocodile (projet de film inabouti), it is actually a GA on French Wikipedia. WP:BEFORE litra B, #6 suggest that interlanguage links are checked prior to nomination for deletion. Sources do not seem to be a problem, I have added four cite books, and further sources exist to pass WP:GNG. — Sam Sailor 15:54, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep – The depth and quality of the coverage in the French Wikipedia article is compelling. Based on this information, the subject passes WP:GNG. Mz7 (talk) 02:35, 19 February 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.