Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Funk


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was Keep. Krakatoa Katie  23:47, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Le Funk

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Non notable album. No reliable sources can be found for the album, nor has there any evidence that it has appeared on any chart. Does not satisfy WP:MUSIC.--Kylohk 16:50, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The band barely makes WP:Band already. This article has to go. Stellatomailing 15:41, 31 May 2007 (UTC) Keep if the Band Stays  Reviewing the policy, I have to agree with Closenplay. If the band stays, the album stays. Unless somebody is nominating the band article to go.Stellatomailing 02:35, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep It's about as stubby as an album stub can be but I strongly disagree that the band "barely makes WP:BAND" (not that you would know from their poorly referenced article). Definitely a notable band and by extension the album should be kept. Closenplay 01:31, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I worked the article over but good. My above disparaging of the article as "stubby" no longer stands. Closenplay 14:43, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep—Multiple professional reviews are now listed. I agree with Closenplay that the band article could use some improved referencing.--Paul Erik 14:43, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - I see an AMG link, the band's notable from all appearances. Stubbiness isn't really a deletion criterion. Crystallina 02:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep Not a great article but the subject is a notable publication by a notable band. A1octopus 18:30, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.