Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Journal Inattendu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to RTL (French radio). j⚛e deckertalk 05:06, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Le Journal Inattendu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Notability not established for over 5 years.  Puffin  Let's talk! 16:20, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:21, 23 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar  ♔  23:29, 2 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect. (changed from "Delete"). In the French Wikipedia there are a number of hits on the topic (see search results on "Le Journal Inattendu") but there is not a separate article.  So I would tend to agree that an English language wikipedia article is not needed, and this is not sourced. -- do  ncr  am  23:50, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Per Hobbes Goodyear, redirecting to RTL (French radio) seems fine. Article can be recreated from redirect, with edit history intact, if/when sourcing is found for a more substantial article. -- do  ncr  am  00:21, 10 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Redirect to RTL (French radio), the article for its radio station, where it is already listed. I suspect that if I read the language and French RS's weren't so heavily paywalled, I could demonstrate notability, but, as it is, I've come up short. Many hits, but little substantially about the subject. This brief piece in Le JDD is about as good as it gets: notes its 45-year history, million-listener audience, and status as an "institution de RTL". If someone can find better sourcing, now or in future, I'd be happy to reconsider. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.