Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Soir de Tunisie (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:20, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Le Soir de Tunisie
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Old nomination text : Unsourced article with a spammy youtube link. If you decline afd's without reason, improve then, instead of being too much wanting to fuck someone over. EDIT : And it does not meet WP:NNEWSPAPER. &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  19:31, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete fails GNG. I've found coverage of a similarly-named paper in Algeria, but nothing on this one apart from its own website.  The Arabic Wikipedia article is also of no help in demonstrating notability. power~enwiki ( π,  ν ) 18:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep – Just based on the nominators reasoning: “….instead of being too much wanting to ’’fuck someone over and too lazy to improve the article. EDIT ". No call, what so ever, for this type of nomination.  SHAME SHAME SHAME. ShoesssS Talk 19:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * WP:POINT vote striked by Shadowowl
 * Shoes, why weren't you there when some editor incorrectly removed some of my nominations at random? Seriously, I was angered by some user removing nominations while doing bloody nothing to fix them. He didn't even thought it was needed to inform me on my talk. No need for shame-calling and WP:POINT voting, and I have striked your vote. -- &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  21:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment - Do not ever Strike  out an other editors comment without their permission, unless they violate Wikipedia Policy. Only and last warning till I take higher.  ShoesssS Talk 22:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Then replace your keep vote to a comment vote as it is a pure WP:POINT vote. It has nothing to do with the article. I apologize for editing your comment, but I still feel that my strike is justified and I will put it back if you refuse to make it a comment vote, as it has nothing to do with the content. -- &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  22:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment – Versus distracting from this AFD with side issues. Please read my response on your  talk |Your Talk Page
 * What would happen if you nominated some articles for deletion, and I randomly speedy-kept them without a reason. Would you be happy about that? -- &raquo; Shadowowl  &#124;  talk  22:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * CommentAs that you found it necessary to “Delete” my comments on your talk page. I found it necessary to post here.
 * ==Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Soir de Tunisie (2nd nomination)==
 * Hello Shadowowl .  Understanding that you may be new to Wikipedia, I have not reported this incident to any Admininistrators.  However, one of the Golden Rule’s of Wikipedia is that all edits by any EDITOR is presumed to be in Assumed To Be In Good Faith unless that editor makes inflammatory – derogatory or false claims.  And even than, you not have the authority or permission to Strike   their remarks!  You can Rollback – Revert and even have the user BLOCKED.  But you do not have the right to  STRIKE  their edit.  Hopefully this is just a “Learning” experience, and hope to see you around contributing to the efforts.  Regards.  ShoesssS Talk 22:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Tunisia-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Africa-related deletion discussions. North America1000 23:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete for failing WP:NNEWSPAPER. Since it appears to be transitioning out of the newspaper business, it is unlikely to ever meet that notability guideline. Ifnord (talk) 17:59, 22 July 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.