Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le Van Hung


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was keep; given that the nomination and the two initial !votes were regarding a lack of sources (and hence a lack of notability), the five sources which were found counters this. I've added the five references to the article, however they need to be wikified per MOS. Daniel.Bryant [ T · C ] 01:38, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Le Van Hung


Seems to be a personalised account. see also Cruel april Tim! 12:01, 12 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fully unsourced.  --Nehwyn 13:43, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOT meshach 19:44, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment This would be a reliable source on the subject. It's a document from the CGSC.  This might be another one, but I don't have access.  This might be a good place for sources as well.  ColourBurst 00:54, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep, a general in the ARVN, and the siege of An Loc was one of the major battles of the Easter Offensive. --Groggy Dice 05:28, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Groggy Dice. Torinir ( Ding my phone  My support calls   E-Support Options  ) 22:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep This appears to be a signifficant figure in the Vietnam War. Besides the references above, other accounts also suggest importance  .  --Oakshade 05:58, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep per Oakshade  Un  focused  07:31, 15 November 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.