Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Le nozze di Figaro (Herbert von Karajan recording)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus was the subject passes WP:NALBUM (non-admin closure) Rollidan (talk) 21:38, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Le nozze di Figaro (Herbert von Karajan recording)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails all of the criteria of WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines. -- Softlavender (talk) 20:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 20:51, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Comment. The criteria in WP:WikiProject Classical music/Guidelines is from an essay by a WikiProject and does not carry the broad support of wikipedia policy. Further, this guideline section is currently being considered for removal for WP:NPOV concerns, as well as its conflict with the policy at WP:NALBUM.4meter4 (talk) 01:17, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per criteria one at WP:NALBUM. A search revealed these sources: Gramaphone, American Opera Singers and Their Recordings: Critical Commentaries and Discographies, McFarland Press, page 368, 2004, The Metropolitan Opera Guide to Recorded Opera, Paul Gruber, page 293, W. W. Norton & Company, 1993. With it's entries in other notable published reference works this is a slam dunk keep.4meter4 (talk) 14:48, 21 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:NALBUM. The article's COPYVIO issues have now been addressed - brief quotes from reviews will be supplied in due course. For further coverage of the album, see Opera, Oct 1979, p. 974.Niggle1892 (talk) 01:07, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment, suggest that just about any album involving Herbert von Karajan is likely to be notable (i am reminded of point no. 5 of WP:NBOOK), anyway, with the number of reviews in the article, and sources listed in this afd it definitely meets WP:NALBUM so is a keep. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:24, 22 September 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.