Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lea Lexis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Black Kite (talk) 07:59, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Lea Lexis

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Fails PORNBIO and GNG as well. The one potential reliable source is an interview and Therefore doesn't count as a secondary source, Spartaz Humbug! 21:18, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:15, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:16, 2 April 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep - notable. Subtropical -man   talk   (en-2)   16:21, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No nontrivial credible biographical content. A clear demonstration of how so many porn industry trade sources fail basic RS requirements. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 12:10, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I won't comment on her gorgeous looks and I won't say "Looks unfortunately don't count towards notability" as that would be inappropriate, Can't find any evidence of notability so will have to say Delete. – Davey 2010 Talk 21:32, 7 April 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.