Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lead Masks Case


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 20:43, 1 December 2012 (UTC)

Lead Masks Case

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article was originally created to advance the idea that UFOs somehow killed this people. The only references are minor and in foreign language UFO titles. The UFO angle was removed from the article as completely unsupported, and now the article makes no sense. There's no attempt to explain why this is notable and the whole thing makes no sense. To remain as an article here this needs to have multiple, reliable sources giving non-trivial coverage in a way that demonstrates notability per Wikipedia's policies. DreamGuy (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:21, 10 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment: I've added a few more refs, but nothing too special. I could add a couple more links within the next days, but none of them will be too different from the ones that are already in the text. Actually, the article lacks sense exactly because the UFO parts were removed, although most of the sources cite the ufology angle. But the text still makes it quite clear that two men were murdered in uncommon, unclear circumstances, hence the notability. As I said, the sources won't get much better than this, so we'll have to leave this discussion to other editors' judgment on the verifiability of those refs. Victão Lopes  I hear you... 01:28, 12 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete Simply not notable--Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 21:48, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley   Huntley  00:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Spinning Spark  13:51, 24 November 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete A couple of 40-year-old mysterious deaths (the article does not say murders) which have been retold by conspiracy/UFO theorists. There are some references, but none are to Reliable Sources, meaning that pretty much everything about this case is unverified. Verification is one of the WP:PILLARS. --MelanieN (talk) 00:54, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Delete These cases are definitely not notable. Morefoolhim 18:53, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.