Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader (spark)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Yunshui 雲 水 09:56, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Leader (spark)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

0 sources, plus appears to be a part of a larger topic. Cheers, FriyMan Per aspera ad astra 07:30, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep Definitely a well-covered and much-referenced thing . Looking through the connected articles, Lightning goes into some detail, but with specific reference to lightning only. The phenomenon is more general and would benefit from standalone treatment, with generous links to special cases - which is what the article already does. Keep and add some of the readily available sources. -- Elmidae (talk · contribs) 15:57, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. Complete failure of WP:BEFORE. Yet another case of assuming unsourced means unsourceable. In depth sources are easily found, this book spends several pages introducing the topic  and later devotes a whole chapter to it . Other book sources with in-depth coverage include .  As for "part of a larger topic", I've never heard such an inane rationale for deletion.  Everything is part of a larger topic.  Shall we reduce the whole encyclopaedia to just one page? SpinningSpark 23:47, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep per Elmidae and Spinningspark. I might suggest a move to Leader (electricity), but that's not for this discussion. —&#8288; 烏&#8288;Γ (kaw) │ 00:09, 09 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.