Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leader of the Opposition (Bulgaria)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- RoySmith (talk) 13:58, 18 September 2016 (UTC)

Leader of the Opposition (Bulgaria)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This seems like WP:OR original research, and that there is no such thing as "Leader of the Opposition" in Bulgarian proportionally-elected parliament. The same reasoning from Articles for deletion/List_of_Serbian_parliamentary_opposition_leaders and Articles for deletion/Leader of the Opposition (Sweden) holds: this title is only applicable to Westminster System and similar. The article is unsourced as to the application and legitimacy of such position, apart from the obvious election results. No such user (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC) No such user (talk) 11:34, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bulgaria-related deletion discussions. No such user (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. No such user (talk) 11:38, 22 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:59, 30 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete per WP:SYN. A Parliamentary system does not automatically establish the official existence of an Official Opposition. RegistryKey(RegEdit) 06:57, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as this is simply a localized position and then also only containing a list of those exact politicians; all in all, there's not even enough to suggest we could accept as its own article, therefore this is honestly best mentioned elsewhere. SwisterTwister   talk  00:16, 18 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.