Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadership at Patrican Brothers' College, Fairfield


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Snowball delete -- JForget  02:22, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Leadership at Patrican Brothers' College, Fairfield

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Article on non-notable topic: the student leadership system at one particular school. A disputed PROD, PROD tag removed with the comment "i object to this banner" Mattinbgn\talk 07:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions.  -- Mattinbgn\talk 07:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * DELETE. Non-notable topic, some of the content can be merged into main article, not even worth a redirect. Cquan (after the beep...) 07:24, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Entirely non-notable topic, and close to being speedy-able under G11 as advertising. --Nick Dowling (talk) 07:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, I tried speedy, tried prod. Heavy Seltzer (talk) 08:27, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

to those above who nominate this page for delete. it was created to remedy an issue with this content on the orignal page. it was agreed by discussion that the information could be included on a seperate page. to Nick Dowling, i question how on earch you can possibly classify this as advertisment. to Cquan, i agree that this should not be a redirect, the information can be included on the orignal page, however there were users who used bully-like tactics to have it removed. it was agreed that there would be a redirected page. if you are prepared to second me to have it reincluded on the original page then i would apreciate this. thankyou Zebra91 (talk) 08:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

this page was created to remedy issues with the content on the original page Patrican Brothers' College, Fairfield. it was decided through dicussion that this content should not be incuded on the main page, but could be linked to another page, hence this addition. it is not of any consequence that this is the leadership strucutre at one school. the point of wikipea is to provide information to the general public. this is information that some people may find interesting, and if only one person finds it useful, that it has a right on wikipedia.

i would request that the referal for deletion is removed for this reason. cheers Zebra91 (talk) 08:44, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment From reading the discussion at Talk:Patrician Brothers' College, Fairfield it looks like there was a consensus that this material doesn't belong on Wikipedia. As such, this appears to be a content fork of the article on the school, which is probably also a good reason for deletion. --Nick Dowling (talk) 09:25, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete The content is not notable; similar content could be constructed for any school. For it to be considered notable, it needs to pass a test stronger than "information that some people may find interesting" Murtoa (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Content is not notable and is of little interest. This has been an ongoing issue and clearly the creator has misunderstood the result of the discussion at Talk:Patrician Brothers' College, Fairfield. Loopla (talk) 11:37, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

then why doesnt loopla explain what he is enforcing, i mean, suggesting, aa a remedy. because this was the conclusion that was reached. Zebra91 (talk) 12:08, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment: the suggested remedy was to add an external link to the article that had contained the information; "external" meaning "not Wikipedia". ...  disco spinster   talk  14:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as unencyclopedic information, which had been explained to the original author when s/he kept adding it to the main article. ...  disco spinster   talk  14:19, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment on remedy There was a content dispute on the school page, regarding the list of all former head-students at the school. The eventual outcome was to remove the names of the head-students, and have a link in the external links section of the page to the list (which is hosted on an outside page). It appears that Zebra91 has interpreted this and made a page on wikipedia listing them, which is hence why this page is created. Hope that helps everyone understand the problem. Twenty Years 14:42, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable topic. Fails WP:N. Twenty Years 14:45, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, possibly Speedy delete as A7/nn-club. No notability asserted, basically just a big list of non-notable people.  Wikipedia is not your school yearbook. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  15:15, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - Thinking a WP:COI or WP:POV here. Read through the discussion and the removal of the contents that is in this article was clearly indicated as un-encyclopedic. --Pmedema (talk) 17:35, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as too much detail - information is not useful to anyone except a vanishingly small number of students and ex-students of the school. WP:N applies here.  Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:33, 5 March 2008 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.