Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadfeeder


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America1000 14:55, 24 September 2018 (UTC)

Leadfeeder

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Company has a lot of mentions in various places, including some RS, but it's all ROUTINE sort of coverage. Lacks multiple independent reliable secondary sources covering it in significance as per NCORP. Best, Barkeep49 (talk) 20:05, 10 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom, not notable. &mdash; Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:38, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 23:15, 10 September 2018 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep - Passes GNG as there are over 3000 g news search results, as well as some g scholar and highbeam results. Needs to be cut down to remove some promo but its notable. - Editor General of Wiki (talk) 04:29, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Comment 3000 g news hits is not a reason. For the others, please post links to articles/references that you believe meet the criteria for establishing notability (see WP:NCORP).  HighKing++ 13:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete: Does not meet WP:CORPDEPTH; the sourcing is routine and / or WP:SPIP. Just a company going about its business & corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:02, 12 September 2018 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kpg  jhp  jm  01:23, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - borderline G11, definitley a violation of WP:PROMO. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:26, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm unable to find any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP.  HighKing++ 13:20, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Delete - There are some good in-depth references out there; however, they are all written by contributors and not staff writers which leaves them unreliable for establishing notability. --CNMall41 (talk) 21:02, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.