Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadhome


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗ plicit  11:25, 29 May 2022 (UTC)

Leadhome

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NCORP. Lack WP:SIGCOV, WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:RS. Hence, calling for an AfD discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and South Africa. Hatchens (talk) 04:24, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete, I am inclined to agree. While fairly well written and sourced, the sources don't actually assert notability and merely corroborate the prose in what is essentially a promotional article. All we know is that they exist but what have they done of note to warrant an article? Not a notable company in my opinion. Bungle (talk • contribs) 07:22, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH, WP:NCORP.   scope_creep Talk  14:15, 28 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete: An article about a company, with start-up coverage and announcement-based coverage of brand initiatives as the available references. A company going about its business, but, as says above, there is no indication why this firm would be of encyclopaedic notability. AllyD (talk) 09:19, 29 May 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.