Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leading Families of Lakki Marwat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tim Song (talk) 22:26, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Leading Families of Lakki Marwat

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

There is already a full article Marwat on this topic and it can not even be merged with this parent article as this particular entry is full of vanity entries and mentions petty and unknown people of the area. Not at all in line with notability policy of Wikipedia either.  MARWAT  08:06, 1 March 2010 (UTC)


 * keep

This article cites sources and the notability of the people mentioned is explained in descriptions of their achievements and positions.

Fascinating information about Lakki Marwat. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 218.22.11.67 (talk) 02:48, 3 March 2010 (UTC) — 218.22.11.67 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Strong Delete, My Self a Marwat, I am well aware of all the leading families of this tribe and they have been adequately included in the parent article. This particular entry is full of people who are unknown entities and it smells badly as a vanity effort. Besides important detail is already included in the parent article. --  MARWAT   17:39, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Just a long list of people, few of whom have individual articles, with lots of peacock words.  The sources given are hard to verify, one of them is listed twice, and another is unpublished. Favonian (talk) 22:19, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * KEEP Sources are cited and also the notability is shown by the descriptions of the people. This is a valuable contribution to the encylopedia. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.254.213.44 (talk) 01:30, 6 March 2010 (UTC)  — contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

'''if someone creats a page about his faction, you shouldn't nominate it for deletion. after all WHO are you to decide? you are not the only Marwat. there are hundred thousand Marwats who have equal right to have their share on the page''' —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.212.246 (talk) 15:04, 5 March 2010 (UTC)  — 116.71.212.246 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Comment, I am an old and good faith editor at Wikipedia and all of us who are well wishers of Wikipedia can distinguish between self praise and vanity. As for your above threat, I have already reported it to Admins. --  MARWAT   16:21, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 09:23, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - nothing here that can't be adequately covered by Marwat. Nothing to suggest notability of the topic of the leading families that requires a separate article.-- Beloved Freak  11:31, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Keep

Information has sources and is notable. This is why wikipedia was created, to be an encyclopedia of everything noteworthy.

Even the leading families of lakki marwat.

Fascinating information that should be EXPANDED ON, not deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.64.222.118 (talk) 11:30, 12 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.