Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leadwerks Engine


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Obviously this does not prevent anyone from creating a revised version of the article in future provided they address the concerns about lack of coverage in third party reliable sources and promotional wording.  Hut 8.5  22:00, 13 September 2016 (UTC)

Leadwerks Engine

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence of third-party notability since creation; most references are primary; heavily promotional in tone (was created before the software was even released). PROD was removed, but article hasn't improved in the years since. David Gerard (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. North America1000 05:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:43, 21 August 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:54, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, I do not see any reliable sources in the article.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: Final relist Nordic   Nightfury  12:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nordic   Nightfury  12:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
 * TNT the article and add the first four hits from a video game reliable sources custom Google search. czar  05:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete There needs to be third party coverage to see if the software is notable. I don't find any in this case. This is especially surprising considering that software related topics are quite easy to source. --Lemongirl942 (talk) 18:59, 13 September 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.