Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League for Marche


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Star  Mississippi  15:23, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

League for Marche

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

A very small local party, it is practically almost impossible to find sources concerning it on the web. We only know that it was founded by the local politician Enzo Marangoni and that it ran in the provincial elections of Macerata in 2011 (without the election of any councilor). It does not seem to meet the principles of general notability in the least. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 11:35, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations, Politics,  and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 11:48, 3 July 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep. Every little piece of political history deserves a space in Wikipedia, whose greatness lies specifically in gathering and organising infos which would be difficult to find elsewhere. The subject is a political party which was represented in the Regional Council of Marche and is sourced. Of course, the passing of time makes difficult to find more sources and information in the web, but the party existed. If there is no consensus on keeping it as a stand-alone article, let's merge it with League for Marche. --Checco (talk) 12:01, 3 July 2022 (UTC)
 * It does not appear that this party has ever officially been represented at the regional council of Marche and even the sources on this party are almost non-existent...--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 12:57, 3 July 2022 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  13:39, 10 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - No inherent notability: the fact that a party exists/existed doesn't mean it deserves an article in Wikipedia. Very few sources can be found about this party. P1221 (talk) 15:18, 5 July 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete per User:P1221. Yakme (talk) 14:29, 12 July 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.