Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/League for the Revolutionary Party


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Revolutionary Socialist League (U.S.).  Sandstein  10:25, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

League for the Revolutionary Party

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has no citations and only a link to the organization’s website. It has no elected officials or electoral history. Organization does not appear to have significant, non-trivial coverage in reliable sources. Toa Nidhiki05 15:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 15:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete a completely unsourced article that has been here - with nary a source - since Trotsky was alive. OK, maybe not that long, but since 2004 with no sources.  gBooks shows nearly nothing .  E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:24, 29 April 2019 (UTC) strike iVote per sources found.E.M.Gregory (talk) 09:58, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Keep. I see coverage here, here, its website has been saved by the Taminent Library at New York University, and here. A quick search produces these sources and it seems clear that a more thorough search would produce more. At the barest minimum, the content should be merged to Revolutionary Socialist League (U.S.) and the page redirected. However, given the sourcing above, it seems clear that the article should be kept and improved.--TM 00:35, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Your second source is from Proletarian Revolution, which is this organization’s magazine. That’s self-publication and doesn’t establish notability or significant, non-trivial coverage The other three don’t qualify as significant, non-trivial coverage, and the last two aren’t even coverage at all. I would be supportive of a merge to Revolutionary Socialist League however. Toa Nidhiki05 12:17, 30 April 2019 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge to Revolutionary Socialist League (U.S.), there are just enough sources to make merge preferable to delete.E.M.Gregory (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per E.M.Gregory. Mccapra (talk) 21:38, 1 May 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Scott Burley (talk) 02:48, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note to closing editor. There is consensus here, with all 4 editors who have come to the page agreeing to the proposed merge.10:12, 10 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.