Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah (The Walking Dead)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__ to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. Liz Read! Talk! 07:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)

Leah (The Walking Dead)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non-notable Walking Dead character all sources are either episode reviews or interviews with the actress. Fictional history is all unsourced. Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 05:46, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Fictional elements, Science fiction and fantasy,  and Television. . Questions? four Olifanofmrtennant (she/her) 06:29, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep if more sources are found, otherwise merge to List of The Walking Dead (TV series) characters. BOZ (talk) 06:32, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Keep. Per WP:SIGCOV, Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material. Multiple of the episode reviews cited substantially treat the Leah character. Per MOS:PLOTSOURCE, a plot synopsis does not need to be sourced with in-line citations, as it is generally assumed that the work itself is the primary source for the plot summary (though the synopses in the Leah article do need to be substantially shorter). Hydrangeans (she/her &#124; talk &#124; edits) 07:47, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * @Hydrangeans Can you name/link/analyze two SIGCOV-meeting sources? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 02:14, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Merge per BOZ. This is lacking in WP:SIGCOV. Merge is a fine WP:ATD and someone can always revisit this if there is significant reception more than WP:PLOT summary. Shooterwalker (talk) 16:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.