Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Cecil


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Leah Cecil

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Cecil was Miss California in 2012. All the coverage is related to that. While there is an article from the LA Times, it exists purely because she won the title and tells little about her, it is not the type of indepth coverage we would want to pass GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:25, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:58, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:31, 1 December 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 10:30, 8 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete -- per prior AfD outcomes, pages on state-level pageant wins are routinely deleted, unless the subject is notable for something else. This is not the case here. K.e.coffman (talk) 02:37, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - Being a beauty pageant winner is not enough in itself to prove notability.-- CaroleHenson (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as absolutely trivial and unconvincing outside of the pageant claims. SwisterTwister   talk  23:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - No notablility other than the pageant. Does not pass WP:GNG. -AuthorAuthor (talk) 00:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.