Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leah Herz


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete per BIO & SNOW SkierRMH (talk) 04:23, 28 November 2007 (UTC)

Leah Herz

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Creator contested prod. Only claim of notability competing in the "Blue Team" of a reality show. The notability claim makes A7 unaplicable. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:15, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. She doesn't appear to have gained any particular critical attention for her part in this series, and I couldn't find any independent nontrivial sources discussing her in any way that would verify her notability. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:19, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete famous for 10 minutes, non-notable Mayalld (talk) 22:23, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment that means she still has 5 minutes of faim still ahead! Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 22:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Strong Delete couldn't get much more non-notable. RMHED (talk) 22:24, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment I apologize sincerely, but I'm not used to the policies of Wikipedia.  I added a link to a site that lists the cast of Scaredy Camp (including Leah) and I hope that's a step to making this articl legitimate. (talk) 22:44, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete A7. Pretty uncontroversial. From above (now blocked) user's edit summary "I will edit this article to make it more suitable for wikipedia's purposes. I know Leah personally from school and can assure you that all of the information provi..." Rocket000 (talk) 23:31, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment Users blockstatus is irrelevant for the AfD discussion. I understand you want to use it as an argument, but it really doesn't have much to do with this discussion. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:34, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * um.. no. Did I say that's why it should be deleted? Rocket000 (talk) 23:51, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Sorry, I'm bad at coming out of my words at the moment for some reason. That was in no way meant as an attack or anything. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 23:54, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
 * lol. It's cool. The only reason I mention the user was blocked is because he/she commented above me (the one with just the talk page link). I figured it would be good to know if someone was going to reply to them. (EDIT: By the way, it doesn't apply in this case, but user's blockstatus is relevant in some deletion cases → CSD G5) Rocket000 (talk) 00:03, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * G5 is about banned users, not blocked users Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 00:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * One and the same. Banning policy. Ok, I'm done :) Rocket000 (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete The two "sources" (naked URLs in the article) given are tv.com, which is not a reliable source, and I was unable to find a single source about this person not related to this small appearance in the Nickelodeon show. Ariel  ♥  Gold  00:12, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Individual pretty clearly falls short of WP:BIO.--Isotope23 talk 00:55, 28 November 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.