Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leama & Moor


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Leama & Moor

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

My searches found no better sourcing to suggest this better notable and improvable and could at best be redirected to Andy Moor after deletion. SwisterTwister  talk  06:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Notifying author  and tagger .  SwisterTwister   talk  06:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  06:25, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

This is their homepage: http://www.leamaandmoor.com/ and there is more text on their "About" page of the website which could be used in the article. 134.176.171.89 (talk) 12:29, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  16:16, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Redirect to Andy Moor; insufficient coverage to justify a standalone article. Vanamonde93 (talk) 16:49, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — UY Scuti Talk  19:01, 20 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete Needs Much More References. Also, it has Redirect to the Artist. So that Page Should Suffice.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by CalabJessika (talk • contribs) 09:18, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable band.The Cross Bearer (talk) 19:58, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - does not pass WP:NMUSIC, and nothing in searches turned up enough to show they pass WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 13:45, 28 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.