Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leann Hunley


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) gidonb (talk) 06:28, 23 September 2018 (UTC)

Leann Hunley

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced BLP. Not sending to BLP PROD as there are external links, but they are likely unreliable (example: it has a link to IMDb, which is not considered a reliable source). Likely passes WP:NBIO, but needs citations to confirm that - will withdraw if reliable sourcing is provided. Kirbanzo (talk) 17:57, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:30, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 18:31, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Keep WP:N: "Notability is based on the existence of suitable sources, not on the state of sourcing in an article." Even a casual WP:BEFORE finds a profile in People, confirmation of Emmy win in Los Angeles Times , discussion in a book , for example. Many more articles with in-depth coverage show up in newspaper archives from the 1980s, eg "UW dropout Leann Hunley finds her calling on 'Dynasty'" (Seattle Times 05 May 1987: F1), "Days Of Our Lives fans will miss Leann Hunley" (Toronto Star 01 Nov 1986: S92), "Leann Hunley has a date with an angel" (St. Petersburg Times 09 Feb 1988: 7D). Subject easily passes WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR. Bakazaka (talk) 21:11, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep, per above. I'd ask the nominator to, if they state in the very nomination that the article should probably be kept and lacks contentious content, consider doing a cursory WP:BEFORE, find some basic sources, or try to bring it to other editors' attention if that's not an option, instead of immediately bringing it to AfD, given the bureaucratic burden an AfD means when we have to discuss "should we have this article?" instead of "how can we make this article better?". /Julle (talk) 02:15, 21 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Keep She has had notable roles on shows such as Dynasty and Days of Our Lives (where she won a Daytime Emmy). There are also several newspapers articles about her during her peak fame in the 1980s, so she also meets the GNG. 1,2, 3, 4, 5, 6 GoldenAgeFan1 (talk) 01:53, 22 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.