Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lear Bunda


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  11:35, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Lear Bunda

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Does not meet gng or any other notability guideline. The two reliable sources copy on him consists of only his name. All other sources are primary, not reliable or both. Being nominated in the Melbourne, Florida film fest wouldn't buy a film notability, much less its producer. John from Idegon (talk) 07:02, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toffanin (talk) 19:24, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete for now as my searches simply found nothing better aside from results at News and browser. SwisterTwister   talk  18:04, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Georgia (U.S. state)-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:14, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:45, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable at the present time to warrant a stand alone article. Kierzek (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.