Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LearnDiscovery – mindmap of Wikipedia (software)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:18, 5 October 2015 (UTC)

LearnDiscovery – mindmap of Wikipedia (software)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No coverage whatsoever can be found in reliable sources. GNG is clearly not met and the sources present in the article (none of which are reliable) don't even mention LearnDiscovery itself. Satellizer  (´ ･ ω ･ `)  04:11, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions.  Satellizer   (´ ･ ω ･ `)  04:12, 28 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Only one independent hit that is in a language I can't read, and that it is not in the title it is probably too passing a mention to matter the notability.  野狼院ひさし  u/t/c 04:37, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete Tried to checked with "LearnDiscovery" or "Learn Discovery". Found results in English.
 * Google: web: - images
 * Also one word (no white space) bring pertinent results
 * Bing: or
 * Found videos with
 * However the word "software" can be misleading: the item is a mobile app.
 * Googling with keyword "software" does not lead to matching results, while with the keyword "app" it does.
 * About source not mentioning LearnDiscovery itself: edited article with app producer.
 * Article is modeled with "Discovr" article as mockup.
 * Article is modeled with "Discovr" article as mockup.


 * Gg4u (talk) 12:52, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * None of the pages you linked to are reliable sources. Satellizer   (´ ･ ω ･ `)  01:37, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete Pretty well junk from obvious COI. Pinkbeast (talk) 15:02, 28 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - I don't see any reliable source coverage to meet the WP:GNG. Article seems promotional in nature and was written by someone whose vast majority of edits are to this article as well... Sergecross73   msg me  14:23, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.