Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learn Magic Cards


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Learn Magic Cards

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not a notable book. The review in Dragon magazine is thoroughly negative (prospective readers should stay well clear of the book.); while that doesn't impact notability it does suggest that people would not have promoted to the book. That magazine also appears to cover substantially every published book in the topic area.

The only other reference is Goodreads, and I find nothing else other than comprehensive databases of published books. One review in a trade publication is insufficient to meet GNG. User:力 (power~enwiki, π,  ν ) 17:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 17:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. User:力 (power~enwiki,  π,  ν ) 17:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)


 * delete seems like a clear cut case. The one Amazon review says "Drivel, but hysterically funny drivel".Slimy asparagus (talk) 09:24, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and Slimy asparagus. Does not meet WP:GNG. pinktoebeans  (talk) 21:31, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - my searches did not uncover any evidence that the publication meets GNG. BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:32, 11 August 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.