Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Learning the periodic table

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE. Stormie 09:14, Feb 9, 2005 (UTC)

Learning the periodic table
Rather a how-to or study guide than an encyclopedic article. The described method probably falls under "original research" as well (not performing the method -- the method itself). Might be appropriate on Wikibooks. Fredrik | talk 19:56, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC) This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.
 * Original research. Though any reference to Tom Lehrer is a good thing. Delete --jpgordon&#8711;&#8710;&#8711;&#8710; 21:12, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Not an encyclopaedia entry. Funny, but not worth to keep. Delete --Neigel von Teighen 21:16, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * ... And only for very small values of "Funny". Delete --RoySmith 21:25, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete Vsmith 01:07, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)