Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Least Favored Nation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was added to BJAODN & delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Least Favored Nation
Delete. No sources cited, unencyclopedic, irrelevant content and subject. Created by a user with (then) only a few days' worth of editing on the site. --TJive 06:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. It saide humurous!!!Blnguyen 06:56, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research, unverifiable, neologism, take your pick. - Randwicked Alex B 09:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete neologism at best. Mark K. Bilbo 13:43, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete OR verging nonsense. Robin Johnson 14:42, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete I laughed until I stopped. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  14:58, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect to Axis of evil Ruby 15:18, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. Stilly stub; not creative enough to qualify for a humor defense (if such a defense even existed). --Aaron 16:04, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete and BJAODNize it. --  み使い   Mitsukai  19:49, 27 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete but put it in BJAODN first Nick Catalano (Talk) 00:50, 28 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Essexmutant 09:11, 29 January 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.