Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leatherhead Fire Station


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete.  An as  talk? 11:58, 10 July 2007 (UTC)

Leatherhead Fire Station

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

I nominate this article for deletion as I believe it does not come up to the standards required by WP:NOTE. I would suggest that the best of it be merged into appropriate sections in Surrey Fire and Rescue Service and Leatherhead. I have contacted an admin over this (off-wiki) and he agrees that it is not notable enough to justify a page of its own. - Vox Humana 8' 23:05, 5 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Rarely would an individual fire station be notable--a few may be in important historic buildings,  but then the article would usually be the building. DGG 00:44, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete References do not assert its notability as a fire station. There have been no significant (referenced) fires it has been involved in and the station itself is not architecturally significant.  Tdmg 03:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete based on that fire stations, just like government buildings are not inherently notable Corpx 06:52, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unless someone provides sources asserting notability. Fire stations are not automatically notable. J Milburn 11:00, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete There are thousands of fire stations in the UK and there is nothing notable about this one. Escaper2007 10:17, 9 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per the above reasonings. --Daysleeper47 12:50, 9 July 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.