Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Leathermarket JMB (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 21:51, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Leathermarket JMB
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log )

No indication of meeting guidelines at WP:ORG. Sources given either are trivial mentions or no mentions at all. Apparent WP:conflict of interest as the article creator appears to be the organisations chairman. noq (talk) 19:56, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable, little better than an advert.I also find it in rather bad taste to use the passing mentions in the murder story covered in reliable sources as notability claims.RafikiSykes (talk) 21:25, 13 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Oh look we now have a rescue tag. I'm not a deletionist by any stretch but surely there are better candidates for rescue than this blatantly promotional offering. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RafikiSykes (talk • contribs)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  —Tom Morris (talk) 05:15, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - No coverage in reliable sources about the organisation. That somebody with a job placement there was murdered is a coincidence and does not establish notability for the organisation. - Whpq (talk) 16:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete - notability per WP:CORP not established. ukexpat (talk) 15:20, 15 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete as per nom and RafikiSykes. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 12:28, 20 September 2011 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.