Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lebanese Marine and Wildlife Museum


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) &mdash; fortuna  velut luna  10:35, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Lebanese Marine and Wildlife Museum

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unsourced article about a private museum. Impossible to verify any of the information, so fails WP:V, one of our core tenets. The source appears to be the director and curator of the museum. Mduvekot (talk) 10:50, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Lebanon-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:03, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 11:04, 26 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep as one of the largest of its kind in the Middle East, I'd imagine there are non English sources. I can neither speak nor read Arabic though StarM 02:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of arabic-related deletion discussions. StarM 02:27, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Keep. It is notable as one of few marine museums in Lebanon, if it is not in fact the only one.  Museums are generally notable as public attractions, and will be covered in travel guides, etc.  I also cannot read Arabic.  I prefer to Keep outright, but a lesser alternative to deletion would be to add an entry for it into an existing or new list of museums in Lebanon or the Middle East, and then to redirect to that entry.  It is simpler to Keep, though, if there is no obvious merger target existing already.  -- do  ncr  am  20:01, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep. Appears notable. The contention that it is impossible to verify any of the information in the article is simply not true.--Pontificalibus (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.